Spotting Examples of Pseudoscience

This chapter emphasizes the importance of helping students to think critically, including by alerting them to these ten warning signs of pseudoscientific assertions:

Lack of falsifiability and overuse of ad hoc hypotheses

Lack of self-correction

Emphasis on confirmation

Evasion of peer review

Overreliance on testimonial and anecdotal evidence

Absence of connectivity

Extraordinary claims

Ad antequitem fallacy (an appeal to tradition as an argument for validity)

Use of hypertechnical language

Absence of boundary conditions

Source: Lilienfeld, S. O., Ammirati, R., & David, M. (2012). Distinguishing science from pseudoscience in school psychology: Science and scientific thinking as safeguards against human error. Journal of School Psychology, 50(1), 7-36.

Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy

A 9-minute video summarizes the goals of mindfulness cognitive therapy and then, at about the 3-minute mark, asks the viewer to engage in an exercise in which they use mindfulness-based methods to deal with worry about current events (it was shot during the COVID-19 pandemic). This exercise might help your students experience first-hand what mindfulness-based cognitive therapy involves, but be sure to warn them about what the video entails so that anyone who might begin worrying about some especially serious or traumatic source of anxiety has the opportunity to opt out.

Self-Fulfilling Prophesies

In an experiment, men and women in adjoining rooms participated in “get acquainted” conversations over an intercom system. Before the conversations took place, the men were shown a photograph of the woman who was supposedly their conversation partner. Some saw a photo of an obese woman while others saw a woman of normal weight, but the photos were unrelated to the women in the next room. Independent judges who had not seen any of the research participants listened to recordings of the conversations and made ratings of the women’s behavior and personality traits. The women who had talked to men who thought they were of normal weight were rated as more articulate, lively, interesting, exciting, and fun to be with than were the women whose conversation partner thought they were obese. These results suggested that when men thought they were talking to a woman of normal weight, they were more friendly and engaging than when talking to a woman who they thought was obese, and that these differences in the men’s behavior drew correspondingly different behavior from the women.

[Reference: Snyder, M., & Haugen, J. A. (1995). Why does behavioral confirmation occur? A functional perspective on the role of the target. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 963–974.]

Big-Five Personality Dimensions

There is a great cartoon illustrating the fact that a complete view of a person from the perspective of the Big Five model requires taking all five dimensions into account, not just one. It shows the foreman of a jury delivering the following verdict: “We find the defendant guilty on all charges, Your Honor. On the positive side, we really liked his openness and energy.”

Shift Work and Circadian Rhythms

Examples of major industrial accidents in which sleepiness and/or shiftwork disorder may have played a part:

•    The Three Mile Island nuclear power plant incident, which occurred at 4:00 a.m. Overnight shift workers failed to respond quickly and appropriately to a mechanical problem that caused a near meltdown

•    Sleepiness is thought to be partly to blame for the nuclear plant disaster at Chernobyl, which took place at 1:30 a.m.

•    The Exxon Valdez oil tanker spill

•    The Space Shuttle Challenger accident (where managers at the flight center were known to be working irregular hours on very little sleep).

•    Thirty-two passengers were injured on March 24, 2014, when a Chicago Transit Authority train slammed into a station at the end of the line because the train operator had fallen asleep. She had been overtired after working a lot of overtime (Esposito & Rossi, 2014).

•    On February 12, 2009 a Continental airlines flight made a routine takeoff from Liberty Airport in Newark, New Jersey, but as it neared its destination in Buffalo, New York, the plane stalled, then crashed, killing everyone on board. The pilots had failed to properly respond to cockpit warnings that the plane was moving too slowly through the air, and in fact, the Captain actually raised the plane’s nose, slowing it even further. The accident report said that ahead of the flight, both pilots had long commutes and slept in the crew lounge instead of a hotel. Tiredness was cited as one of the factors in the crew’s failure to respond quickly and appropriately to the aircraft’s loss of speed.

Critical Periods: “The Wild Child”

The “wild boy of Aveyron” was a French child who, in the late 1700s, was apparently lost or abandoned by his parents at an early age and had grown up with animals. At about eleven years of age, he was captured by hunters and sent to Paris, where scientists observed and tried to help him. What they saw was a dirty, frightened creature who trotted like a wild animal and spent most of his time silently rocking. Although the scientists worked with the boy for more than ten years, he was never able to live unguarded among other people, and he never learned to speak. In other, more recent cases, children have been rescued after spending their early years isolated from human contact and the sound of adult language. Even after years of therapy and language training, these individuals are not able to combine ideas into sentences (Rymer, 1993). Such cases suggest that there is a “critical period” for learning language and that in order to do so, we must be exposed to speech before a certain age.

[Reference: Rymer, R. (1993). Genie: A scientific tragedy. New York: HarperCollins.]

[Source: Adapted from Bernstein, D.A. (2019). Essentials of Psychology (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.]

 

 

The Effect of Predictable vs. Unpredictable Stressors—in Fish

Marine biologists in Portugal observed the physiological and physical responses of European sea bass to predictable and unpredictable stressors. They first taught the fish to associate the sight of a black-and-yellow-striped card with a stressor, namely a mesh net like the ones used to catch fish in aquaculture operations. The fish in the predictable group always saw the card a minute before the net swept through the fish tank, and so it served as a signal of the impending stressor. The fish subjected to unpredictable stress had no such warning: the card was displayed randomly, before or after the net appeared.

During experimental trials, the researchers recorded changes in cortisol, a stress hormone, in response to predictable vs. unpredictable stressors. They also looked at the fish’s behavior, and measured activity in specific regions of their brains. The fish coped better with predictable stressors. In the unpredictable stressor group, they found stronger stress responses, including higher cortisol levels and more changes in activity in two areas of the fish’s brains that are most similar to the amygdala and hippocampus in human brains. Fish in the unpredictable stress group also made more attempts to escape compared to fish that experienced predictable stress or no stressful events.

[Reference: Cerqueira, M., Millot, S., Felix, A., Silva, T., Oliveira, C.C.V., Rey, S., MacKenzie, S., & Oliveira, R. F. (2020, in press). Cognitive appraisal in fish: Stressor predictability modulates the physiological and neurobehavioural stress response in seabass. Proceedings of Royal Society London B]

The Sleepwalking Killer

A Canadian man named Kenneth Parks began suffering insomnia in his 20s. On the night of May 23, 1987, he got out of bed, drove 14 miles to his in-laws’ house, killed his mother in law and injured his father-in-law with a tire iron and a knife. After the incident, he drove himself to a police station and turned himself in. Up until this point, he had a good relationship with his in-laws, and his wife vouched for his lack of motive in the crime. He claimed he had been sleepwalking, and the following year, he was found not guilty of murder.

Competency to Stand Trial

Here is a recent example in which the process of determining a criminal suspect’s competency to stand trial took so long that the time he spent in jail awaiting trial exceeded the length of his ultimate prison sentence. It also exemplifies the fact that clinical judgments about competency and sanity can be flawed, in this case with tragic consequences.

A man accused in a homicide outside a Home Depot store in Naples, Florida was found incompetent to proceed in a burglary case and had been released from jail about two weeks before the slaying. Kenneth R. Tannassee, 29, was arrested and charged with second-degree murder on Aug. 21 after a homeless woman was found dead inside her vehicle. Tannassee was released from jail on Aug. 4 after he pleaded no contest to charges in a burglary case. He was adjudicated guilty of burglary of an unoccupied conveyance and grand theft. Tannassee was arrested Oct. 23, 2018, after a Collier County Sheriff’s Office deputy responded to a home in the 13800 block of Collier Boulevard in reference to a burglary in progress. Tannassee pleaded not guilty to the charges from the burglary incident on Nov. 19, 2018. Then on July 8, 2019, the judge signed an order appointing an expert to conduct a competency evaluation of Tannassee before the case could proceed, according to court records. Proceedings stalled for several months, during which multiple psychiatric/psychological evaluations concluded Tannassee was incompetent to stand trial, and a judge confirmed that status on December 20th, 2019. The experts determined that Tannassee was incompetent to proceed but did not meet the criteria for commitment to a state hospital (i.e., was not a danger to himself or others). His defense team as well as prosecutors agreed with the assessment, and Tannassee was ordered housed at the Collier County Jail and to receive competency restoration treatment provided by staff from a behavioral health agency. By April, 2020, an expert appointed to conduct re-evaluation of competency found Tannassee competent, stating that he spoke clearly, engaged easily, was cooperative and did not present any unusual behaviors. At a court hearing at the end of July, 2020, Tannassee pleaded no contest to the charges in the burglary case and was sentenced to 18 months in state prison, but since he was given credit for the 21 months he had been in jail since his arrest, he was released. Seventeen days later, he committed a murder.

[Source: Allen, J. (2020). Suspect in East Naples homicide released from jail 17 days before incident. Naples Daily News, August 29, p. 8A.]

The Biological Bases of Behavior

The first example in this chapter of the book is designed to illustrate both the integrated nature of the central and peripheral nervous systems and the complex chain of physical and biological processes that underlie even the simplest forms of behavior:

If your teacher asks you to raise your right hand at the count of three, and then lower it, you surely be able to do so. But how? In order for you to follow these simple instructions, sound waves from your teacher’s vocal cords have to travel through the air and reach your ears, at least one of which has to be in working order. These sound waves will enter your outer ear, pass down your ear canal, and strike your eardrum (tympanic membrane) which will then begin to vibrate. These vibrations will cause similar vibrations in a series of three small bones in your middle ear. Their vibrations will create waves in the fluid that fills a coiled tube (cochlea) in your inner ear and the motion of that fluid will bend tiny hair cells inside the tube. Each of those hairs is connected to nerve cells that travel together (as the auditory nerve) to the brain and the stream of combined messages from all these cells will stimulate the areas of your brain that receive sound. The pattern of stimulation provides information (sensations) about the frequency and intensity (pitch and loudness) of the stream of incoming sound.

But in order for you to understand (perceive) the sounds your teacher made, your brain has to compare them to information about the patterns of sound that are already stored in your long-term memory. If and when it finds matching patterns, you will be able to recognize the stream of sounds as a stream of meaningful words, in this case, the sentences that make up your teacher’s instructions. If the teacher had been speaking an unfamiliar language, you would have still heard (sensed) the sounds, but you would not have been able to recognize (perceive) meaningful words.)

But the story is not over. Now the action shifts to the frontal lobes of your cerebral cortex, where most of your higher cognitive processes occur, including thinking, planning, and decision-making. While holding the information about the teacher’s instructions in your short-term memory, you will have to retrieve information from long-term memory about what your cultural background and other aspects of your social learning has taught you about what is appropriate and inappropriate behavior in a classroom situation (including about complying with instructions and following social norms). On the basis of all this information, you will make a decision about what to do when your brain recognizes the sound of the word “three.” Assuming your decision is to comply, when you hear “three” you will have to execute that decision by remembering where the right side of your body is, and then directing cells in the left cerebral cortex that control movement of the right arm to send movement messages down nerves in your right arm. Through their connections to your muscles, stimulation from these nerves will cause certain muscles to contract and others to relax, thus allowing a smooth arm-raising movement. Sensors that tell the brain where various body parts of your body are (your kinesthetic sense) will confirm that your arm is raised, so even if your eyes are closed, as long as your teacher’s instructions are still in your memory, you will know it is time to execute instructions to reverse the contractions and relaxations so as to bring the arm back to its original position. Once that happens your kinesthetic sense will tell you your arm is lowered. Finally, your memory of this movement sequence will be compared to your memory of the teacher’s instructions, and when it matches you will be aware that you have behaved correctly.